Scientists to act with caution, since obtaining viable oocytes and candidate mothers becomes a bottleneck. Inesem business school advanced course in pharmaceutical biotechnology more information are we playing god? Ethical dilemmas of mammoth cloning although mammoth cloning is attractive from many points of view, it has raised a number of moral dilemmas within the scientific community. The question that has the most weight in this regard among detractors is what role a species that was extinct thousands of years ago will play in today's ecosystems.
On the other hand, those who defend the project argue that the siberian megafauna did not become extinct due to natural causes, but due to E Commerce Photo Editing the action of the human being. In addition, it is emphasized that this species became definitively extinct only 4,600 years ago, so the woolly mammoth would still be able to occupy an ecological niche on our planet. Lastly, the strongest arguments in favor of mammoth resurrection compare the role of current megafauna with that of extinct megafauna . It has been proven that many plants, especially certain tree species with large fruits, require the presence of megaherbivores for the dispersal of their fruits and seeds . In addition, scientific evidence has shown that the removal of megaherbivores from a given environment enhances the abundance of tree species.
This results in a reduction in the diversity of plant species with a higher demand for sunlight, leading in turn to an increase in the frequency of fires . Giant but delicate although it is widely accepted that the human being is responsible for the disappearance of this species, it seems that the low genetic diversity also contributed to a greater or lesser extent. The analysis of the complete genome of two samples found one in the island of wrangel and another in oimyakon with an antiquity of 4336 and 44828 years respectively, put this fact in evidence. Taking into account how far apart both samples are in time and how similar they are to each other,